Analysis of Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections over the Past Two Decades

Thomas Light, Frank Camm, Mary E. Chenoweth, Peter Lewis, Rena Rudavsky

ResearchPublished Feb 22, 2012

To assess the Air Force's bid protest experience, the authors analyzed databases of Air Force procurement and protest activity and estimated statistical models to identify factors contributing to protest activity and outcomes. Specifically, they reviewed other studies of bid protest activity; assembled data on Air Force protests contained in the Protest and Congressional Tracking System (PACTS) database; gathered and assembled information on Air Force procurements contained in the Individual Contracting Action Report (form DD350) and the Federal Procurement Data System — Next Generation (FPDS-NG); performed tabulations to characterize the Air Force's experience with bid protests; and estimated statistical models that rely on the PACTS, DD350, and FPDS-NG databases. The likelihood of bidders' pursuing protests is shown to have been declining at a rate of about 8–9 percent per year, after controlling for other factors. This supports the authors' finding that the Air Force's experience with bid protests has been improving over time.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2012
  • Pages: 60
  • Document Number: TR-883-AF

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Light, Thomas, Frank Camm, Mary E. Chenoweth, Peter Lewis, and Rena Rudavsky, Analysis of Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections over the Past Two Decades. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2012. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR883.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.