Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program

Progress During 2008 and 2009

Dana Schultz, Shannah Tharp-Gilliam, Tamara Dubowitz, Hao Yu, Susan L. Lovejoy, Andrea Phillips, John Engberg

ResearchPublished Jun 17, 2010

The Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act, a referendum passed by Arkansans in the November 2000 election, invests Arkansas' share of the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement funds in seven health-related programs. RAND was contracted to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the progress of the seven programs in fulfilling their missions, as well as the effects of the programs on smoking and other health-related outcomes. This report discusses the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Commission's activities and its responses to recommendations by RAND in the earlier evaluation reports and documents continued activity and progress by the seven funded programs for 2008 and 2009. The report evaluates the progress of each of the funded programs, including assessing progress in achieving programmatic goals and tracking the programs' activities and indicators. It also updates trends in outcome measures developed to monitor the effects of the funded programs on smoking and other health-related outcomes. Finally, it provides both program-specific and statewide recommendations for future program activities and funding, including ongoing strategic planning, developing evaluation measures, collaboration with other programs, and sustaining funding and growth.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2010
  • Pages: 264
  • Document Number: TR-834-ATSC

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Schultz, Dana, Shannah Tharp-Gilliam, Tamara Dubowitz, Hao Yu, Susan L. Lovejoy, Andrea Phillips, and John Engberg, Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress During 2008 and 2009. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR834.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.