The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

Evaluation of the Effects of Using IRS Expense Standards to Calculate a Debtor's Monthly Disposable Income

Stephen J. Carroll, Noreen Clancy, Melissa A. Bradley, Jennifer Pevar, Marianne Culhane, Michaela White

ResearchPublished Jul 23, 2007

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) requires that debtors filing for bankruptcy whose monthly income exceeds the median income for their household size in their state use the IRS expense standards rather than their current expenses to calculate their monthly disposable income (MDI). This change can affect both the options available to a debtor considering filing for bankruptcy and the amount the debtor must pay to creditors under a repayment plan. This report assesses this new requirement’s effects on debtors and the courts, finding the following. Similarly situated debtors may have substantially different payment obligations depending on the jurisdiction in which they live. Each bankruptcy case now requires more judicial time. The IRS standards, especially living expenses, yield larger deductions, on average, and, therefore, lower MDIs across the country. Generally, higher-income debtors gain less using the IRS standards rather than current expenses than do otherwise similar, lower-income debtors; this difference is significant for homeowners and highly so for renters.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 66
  • Document Number: TR-483-EOUST

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Carroll, Stephen J., Noreen Clancy, Melissa A. Bradley, Jennifer Pevar, Marianne Culhane, and Michaela White, The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005: Evaluation of the Effects of Using IRS Expense Standards to Calculate a Debtor's Monthly Disposable Income. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR483.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was prepared for the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.