Evaluation of Workforce-Focused Programming for Probation Youth in Los Angeles County

Laura Whitaker, Nastassia Reed, Vivian Byeon, Susan Turner, Stephanie Brooks Holliday

ResearchPublished Jan 6, 2025

Workforce programming for justice-involved youth in Los Angeles is funded by provisions of the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act. This programming aims to prevent recidivism and lower youths' risk of contact with the justice system. In interviewing the leadership and staff of workforce programs, the authors found that, overall, the programs were considered enticing and beneficial to youth in juvenile camps and halls. However, interviewees noted some challenges. Youth in camps and halls often experience barriers to fully completing the program, and they are limited by the need to achieve and maintain eligibility for the program. Additionally, coordination of the Los Angeles County Probation Department and workforce program systems presents challenges for youth transitioning from detained settings to community settings, which can include long referral times and a subsequent loss of engagement with youth. Interviewees also noted that few probation youth in community settings participate in the programs because of a lack of referrals, competing priorities (e.g., school, friends), disinterest, and community risk factors (e.g., safety).

To address these challenges, the authors recommend: (1) improving the process of connecting eligible youth to the program during the camp-to-community transition process, (2) systematizing and improving coordination between the Probation Department and the county's Department of Economic Opportunity, (3) allowing youth to participate while they procure documents needed for employment, and, if needed, (4) expanding the program to include at-promise youth.

Key Findings

  • Although eligibility criteria prevent many youths from participating and others have barriers to consistent or complete participation, staff perceive workforce programs to be enticing and beneficial to those who are able to participate.
  • Staff perceive workforce programs to be operating well within juvenile camps and halls where youth have structured contact with program administrators, few distractions, and highly controlled schedules.
  • Staff perceive programming for probation youth in the community to be more challenging; fewer youth participate, and there are many barriers affecting the implementation of the program.
  • Staff report that coordination between workforce and Probation Department systems can cause additional work and long referral times for the agencies that could lead to lower enrollment.
  • Staff acknowledge that, once in the community, probation youth face competing priorities, and community risk factors might lead to a lack of participation.
  • Previous iterations of the program had success engaging at-promise youth, and staff suggest that this is a target population that could be easier to serve in community-based settings.

Recommendations

  • Improve the process of connecting eligible youth to workforce programming during the camp-to-community transition process.
  • Systematize and improve coordination between workforce programming and Los Angeles County Probation Department systems.
  • Allow youth to participate in workforce programming while they procure employment documents.
  • If needed, expand workforce programming to include at-promise youth.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2025
  • Pages: 34
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA3217-5
  • Document Number: RR-A3217-5

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Whitaker, Laura, Nastassia Reed, Vivian Byeon, Susan Turner, and Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Evaluation of Workforce-Focused Programming for Probation Youth in Los Angeles County. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2025. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA3217-5.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.