A Model of Air Force Enlisted Retention
Theoretical Background, Implementation, and Estimates Using Conditional Choice Probability Estimation
ResearchPublished Sep 30, 2025
Structural models of military retention are useful for evaluating policy alternatives that are outside historical experience. However, even relatively simple models can require significant compute time. In this report, the author shows how dynamic military retention models can be estimated using a method that avoids the need to solve dynamic programming problems — and, thus, the significant compute time required to do so.
Theoretical Background, Implementation, and Estimates Using Conditional Choice Probability Estimation
ResearchPublished Sep 30, 2025
Structural models of military retention are useful for evaluating policy alternatives that are outside historical experience. However, estimating the parameter coefficients for these models might require solving stochastic, dynamic programs thousands of times for each individual in the data. Even relatively simple models can require significant compute time, which rises rapidly with each additional explanatory variable. Although advances both in computing power and in software over the past few decades have helped increase the size of models that are feasible to estimate, a sufficiently large number of state variables can still render dynamic programming impractical. In this report, the author documents an alternative approach to estimating the coefficients of dynamic discrete choice retention models that avoids the need to solve dynamic programming problems — and, thus, the substantial compute time required to do so.
The research reported here was commissioned by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, Force Management Integration, and conducted within the Workforce, Development, and Health Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.