Using Quality Measures and Measurement-Based Care to Improve Behavioral Health Care for Veterans and Service Members

Kimberly A. Hepner, Carol P. Roth, Claire E. O'Hanlon, Elizabeth Marsolais

ResearchPublished Sep 12, 2023

Cover: Using Quality Measures and Measurement-Based Care to Improve Behavioral Health Care for Veterans and Service Members

Community-based organizations that provide behavioral health (BH) care to veterans, service members, and their families need to ensure that the care being delivered is high-quality and effective, and that it aligns with recommended care. Although these organizations provide needed services, they might not systematically evaluate the quality and the impact of the care that they provide. The aim of this report is to introduce two related but distinct approaches to assessing and improving BH care: using quality measures and measurement-based care (MBC). Using quality measures is an organizational process in which defined measures are used to assess care delivery for a group of patients. In contrast, MBC is a clinical process in which a provider routinely assesses an individual patient’s outcomes, monitors changes in outcomes over time, and engages the patient in using this information to adjust treatment. Although large organizations that serve military populations—such as the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs—have made robust efforts in both areas, community-based organizations could find additional guidance useful to inform how to initiate using quality measures or implement MBC, or to expand their current efforts in these areas. In this report, the authors introduce each of these approaches, present a proposed core set of quality measures that could be useful in initiating ongoing monitoring of BH care quality, and outline key considerations for using MBC that might support community-based organizations' efforts to assess and improve the BH care that they provide. 

Key Findings

  • Two related but distinct approaches to assessing and improving BH care—using quality measures and MBC—could help community-based organizations that provide BH care to veterans, service members, and their families ensure that care is high-quality and effective.
  • A core set of quality measures relevant to depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety could help community-based organizations that provide BH care to expand their quality improvement efforts. The proposed set consists of nine quality measures: five outcome measures, three process measures, and one structure measure.
  • Using MBC within an organization requires support for each stage of MBC (collecting data, sharing the data with patients, and acting on the data through provider-patient treatment discussions), integration of an MBC data platform, and provider training.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hepner, Kimberly A., Carol P. Roth, Claire E. O'Hanlon, and Elizabeth Marsolais, Using Quality Measures and Measurement-Based Care to Improve Behavioral Health Care for Veterans and Service Members. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2522-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.