Staffing the Israel Defense Force in the 21st Century
ResearchPublished Jun 28, 2024
The Israel Defense Force was originally envisioned as a "people's army" in which all citizens would be expected to serve. It now faces changing needs and external and domestic circumstances calling this model with its growing social tensions into question. The authors examine these and related dilemmas and explore a midway solution that would allow individuals to choose either military or civilian national service.
ResearchPublished Jun 28, 2024
The Israel Defense Force (IDF) is at a crossroads. The IDF was originally envisioned as a "people's army" in which all citizens would be expected to serve and that would build social cohesion. But some sections of society are exempt from military service entirely or are not required to serve, thus causing tensions with those who are required to serve. On the other hand, for various reasons, the IDF may need fewer personnel than previously. Various solutions have been proposed for these dilemmas, such as removing some of the exemptions so that service appears more equitable or turning to a more professional, volunteer force.
The authors detail the issues that Israel faces in balancing military manpower requirements not only against potential security threats but also with its complex social and political fabric. They consider both the environment prior to the Hamas assault of October 7, 2023, and what may have changed. They examine a possible midway solution: a coordinated model of compulsory national service that is not limited to military service that would rest on principles of universal participation, optimized pathways to suit different communities' ways of life, the IDF receiving first draft choice, exemptions for talented youth on agreed principles, and volunteer services run by civilian bodies.
Although research was concluded prior to the 2023–2024 conflict in Gaza, the authors conjecture that the issues discussed will have even more relevance going forward and point to several directions of possible change as a result of the war.
Funding for this research was provided by the generous contributions of the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy Advisory Board. The research was conducted by the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy within RAND International.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.