Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a bacterium commonly restricted to low numbers in the human gut without harm. However, imbalance of the gut environment – often in response to antibiotic use or after gastrointestinal surgery – leads to its overgrowth and production of harmful toxins.[1], [2]
Toxigenic C. difficile infection (CDI) can cause damage to the intestines, sepsis and even death.[1], [3]
While some aspects of the burden of CDI are well understood, including healthcare costs and mortality rates, less is known about challenges faced by patients and clinicians with regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of this condition.
Purpose
The primary objective of this study was to better understand the key challenges in the clinical care pathway for CDI , including its diagnosis, treatment and ongoing management in order to inform future clinical practice and policy.
Infection prevention and control in hospitals and communities was not in scope.
Countries of focus
This research focused on five high-income countries (Australia, Canada, France, Italy and the United Kingdom [UK]), which were selected based on geographic variety and having public healthcare systems that are free at the point of service.
Methods
Literature review
PubMed searches conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed literature and web-based grey literature search (June 2021) was also conducted to identify regulations and guidelines on CDI patient care.
Surveys
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 8 experts across the 5 countries of interest, and 3 online workshops were conducted in small groups/individually to reflect on learnings from the narrative review and interviews.
Expert consultations
An online survey of clinicians and scientific experts was conducted to identify improvement opportunities for CDI patient care.
Challenges in the CDI Clinical Care Pathway
Photo by iStock/Md Babul Hosen
Diagnosis
No single diagnostic test is recommended for the detection/diagnosis of CDI
Use of multiple diagnostic tests has both time and cost implications
There is lack of standardised practices with regard to the type of diagnostic tests used within and across the countries of interest
Under and misdiagnosis is common
Long waiting times for a diagnosis are common, especially in community settings
Treatment of first CDI episode
Antibiotics are often the first-line treatment, but they can have side effects, including further disruptions to the gut microbiome
Excessive antibiotic use can potentially lead to anti-microbial resistance
Timely treatment can be an issue, exacerbated by co-morbid conditions
Lack of evidence on optimal treatment strategies, especially for severe infections
Patient monitoring and follow-up
Monitoring of symptoms can be challenging due to staff capacity constraint and because bowel movements are not always easy to record
Difficult to assess whether a patient has been 'cured', as C. difficile can remain in the stool for several weeks after the infection is treated
Managing CDI recurrence
Difficult to diagnose CDI recurrences due to lack of monitoring of specific 'recurrent' symptoms and the ability to distinguish between a recurrence and a new infection
Issues with access to some treatments, such as Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT), which presents workforce capacity, infrastructure and resourcing challenges
FMT is generally considered safe, but it is associated with some risk for adverse events and infection transmission
Lack of research on the long-term safety of FMT
Wider healthcare system and associated challenges for the treatment and management of CDI
Photo by iStock/Tashi-Delek
Access and service delivery
Limited integration between primary and secondary care can delay diagnosis and treatment
FMT presents several challenges:
Difficulty identifying, recruiting and retaining stool donors
Limited staff capacity and delivery infrastructure
Lack of standardisation in its provision
Guidelines and regulations
Variation within and between countries regarding recommendations for first-line therapy and first recurrences
Guidelines are not updated on a regular basis
Guidelines are sometimes modified or applied inconsistently
Economic considerations
Newer antibiotics and emerging treatments (e.g. monoclonal antibodies) are costly
Reimbursement for CDI treatments vary within and across countries
Education and awareness raising
Patients
Stigma, embarrassment and poor awareness of CDI may delay timely diagnosis
Scarcity of public health campaigns about CDI
Little research on how CDI impacts patients/care-givers and their quality of life
Healthcare providers
Awareness about CDI diagnosis and treatment can be low, especially among primary-care providers
Poor coverage of CDI in medical curricula
Top priorities for improving the CDI Clinical Care Pathway
Priorities ranked as important by at least 50% of expert survey participants within at least 3 countries
Diagnosis and treatment
New products are needed to prevent CDI recurrence
New products are needed to better treat CDI recurrence
Access and service delivery
Multidisciplinary care is needed to improve time to diagnosis and treatment
Guidelines and recommendations
Guidelines and recommendations should be updated more regularly in light of new research
Education and awareness of patients
Education is needed on appropriate antibiotic use
Education and awareness of clinicians
Primary care providers should be educated on CDI symptoms
Better awareness is needed among non-expert secondary care providers dealing with CDI
Evidence gaps
More research is needed on optimal treatment regimens
Conclusions
This study identified numerous challenges related to the diagnosis, treatment and management of CDI across the clinical care pathway and the wider health care system, and it has also identified priorities related to improving the clinical care of patients with CDI.
Key Challenges
The need to conduct multiple tests for a conclusive diagnosis
Treatment side-effects
The cost of some antibiotics and emerging treatments
Barriers to access of FMT
Difficulties in distinguishing a CDI recurrence from a new infection
Workforce capacity constraints to effectively monitor patients on treatment and for recurrences
Ascertaining whether a patient has been cured
Key improvement actions
Developing innovative products for both preventing and treating recurrences
Facilitating more multidisciplinary patient care
Updating diagnosis and treatment guidelines
Educating and supporting professionals in primary care and those in secondary care who are not CDI experts on identifying symptoms and managing patients
Notes
[1] Patil R.L. 2013. 'Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clostridium difficile Infection: Are we Propagating an Already Rapidly Growing Healthcare Problem?' Gastroenterology Research 6(5):171–3. doi: 10.4021/gr575w
[2] Sartelli M., S. Di Bella, L. McFarland, S. Khanna, L. Furuya-Kanamori, N. Abuzeid et al. '2019 update of the WSES Guidelines for Management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) Difficile Infection in Surgical Patients.' World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 14:8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3
[3] Guery B., T. Galperine & F. Barbut. 2019. 'Clostridioides Difficile: Diagnosis and Treatments.' BMJ. 366:1–19. l4609. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4609
Hocking, Lucy, Mark Wilcox, Nicola Petrosillo, Paul Griffin, Theodore Steiner, Gail Attara, Joel Doré, Mark Cabling, Stephanie Stockwell, Robert J. Romanelli, and Sonja Marjanovic, Improving care for patients with Clostridioides difficile infection: A clinical practice and healthcare systems perspective, RAND Corporation, RB-A3265-1, 2024. As of May 5, 2026: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA3265-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Hocking, Lucy, Mark Wilcox, Nicola Petrosillo, Paul Griffin, Theodore Steiner, Gail Attara, Joel Doré, Mark Cabling, Stephanie Stockwell, Robert J. Romanelli, and Sonja Marjanovic, Improving care for patients with Clostridioides difficile infection: A clinical practice and healthcare systems perspective. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA3265-1.html.
This study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals and was independently conducted by RAND Europe.
This publication is part of the RAND research brief series. Research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from Ferring Pharmaceuticals.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.