Rethinking Space Force Personnel Reform
A Pragmatic, Agile Path Forward
Expert InsightsPublished Sep 23, 2025
A Pragmatic, Agile Path Forward
Expert InsightsPublished Sep 23, 2025
In this paper, the authors build on Todd Harrison’s call for the transformational reform of the U.S. Space Force (USSF) personnel system. Although the authors agree with Harrison's objectives—including normalizing lateral entry and reentry and promoting merit-based career progression—they propose a more pragmatic and more fully informed implementation strategy that accounts for the strides the USSF has made in personnel reform and the logistical challenges and constraints of a small and lean force.
The authors caution against making sweeping, system-wide changes without the necessary infrastructure and cultural norms. Instead, they advocate for phased or piloted experimentation through targeted programs, streamlined lateral entry pathways, and the refinement of ongoing reforms. By balancing bold innovation with available resources and operational feasibility, the USSF can scale effective changes while mitigating risks associated with a wholesale structural overhaul.
This work was conducted by the Workforce, Development, and Health Program within RAND Project AIR FORCE
This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.