Insights from Nuclear History for AI Governance
Expert InsightsPublished May 21, 2025
Expert InsightsPublished May 21, 2025
There have been multiple proposals for the international governance of artificial intelligence (AI) that draw from the existing nuclear governance regimes. In this paper, the authors analyze lessons from the history of nuclear stability and draw analogies to building international governance of AI. The authors analyze two major episodes in nuclear governance, the failure of the Baruch Plan and the success of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, to understand what factors led to the failure or success of these governance initiatives. The authors also identify the challenges that proposals for global AI governance face that might complicate building a regime similar to the nuclear nonproliferation one. This paper is intended for those interested in potential models for global governance of AI that draw on past global governance efforts, such as nuclear nonproliferation.
This work was independently initiated and conducted within the Technology and Security Policy Center of RAND Global and Emerging Risks using income from operations and gifts from philanthropic supporters. A complete list of donors and funders is available at www.rand.org/TASP.
This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.