Insights from Nuclear History for AI Governance

Expert InsightsPublished May 21, 2025

There have been multiple proposals for the international governance of artificial intelligence (AI) that draw from the existing nuclear governance regimes. In this paper, the authors analyze lessons from the history of nuclear stability and draw analogies to building international governance of AI. The authors analyze two major episodes in nuclear governance, the failure of the Baruch Plan and the success of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, to understand what factors led to the failure or success of these governance initiatives. The authors also identify the challenges that proposals for global AI governance face that might complicate building a regime similar to the nuclear nonproliferation one. This paper is intended for those interested in potential models for global governance of AI that draw on past global governance efforts, such as nuclear nonproliferation.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Boudreaux, Benjamin, Gregory Smith, Edward Geist, and Leah Dion, Insights from Nuclear History for AI Governance. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2025. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3652-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.