The Political Geography of the South China Sea Disputes
A RAND Research Primer
Expert InsightsPublished Oct 19, 2022
A RAND Research Primer
Expert InsightsPublished Oct 19, 2022
The South China Sea is one of the world's most important, strategic, and contentious bodies of water. Yet the origins and development of littoral states' respective claims and the development of international law as it relates to the South China Sea are complicated, confusing, and often poorly understood. This Perspective provides a primer on the South China Sea's political geography — that is, the study of state and nonstate actors and their varied relationships with spaces for territorial purposes. It focuses on the South China Sea's physical geography; the development of littoral states' respective claims to portions of the South China Sea, including islands, rocks, and low-tide elevations; and the increasingly important role of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Funding for this research was provided by the generous contributions of the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy (CAPP) Advisory Board. This research was conducted within the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy, part of International Programs at the RAND Corporation.
This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.