Rebalancing the Information Ecosystem and Renewing Shared Societal Commitments for Information Use
Expert InsightsPublished Oct 27, 2025
Expert InsightsPublished Oct 27, 2025
The authors of this paper outline a strategy for addressing the challenges faced by the U.S. information ecosystem and explore how this ecosystem relates to American democracy and society’s shared values. This paper uses prior research on Truth Decay to set the stage for a next phase of work focused on the management of and commitment to information use. Rather than merely assessing the state of the problem, which has been well established through prior RAND work and the work of others, the authors of this paper emphasize priorities for the next era of research and action, such as proactive measures and future initiatives that can help people manage a diverse information ecosystem, shore up civic infrastructure, and enhance cognitive security. Ultimately, these future efforts can strengthen democracy and improve civic engagement. The paper should be of use to a variety of government and civil society actors committed to helping individuals and community groups navigate and balance diverse sources of information.
Funding for this work was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations.
This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.