Does Burning Weapons Plutonium Generate Hotter Waste and Conserve More Repository Space?
Expert InsightsPublished 1998
This paper describes a comparative methodology that is based on an equal amount of energy generated and an equal amount of weapons plutonium being burned or directly disposed of. The United States and Russia were in the midst of deciding how plutonium from surplus weapons should be disposed of so that it will never be used again to make nuclear weapons. This report discusses whether burning or direct disposal of weapons plutonium would generate more waste heat and consume more repository space. It should be of interest to analysts and policymakers in plutonium disposition and in nuclear nonproliferation. Waste heat has significant implications for repository space requirements and effective waste management.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1998
- Pages: 31
- Document Number: P-8033
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.