Letter
Spillover Effects in Randomized Evaluations of Translational AI
ResearchPosted on rand.org Mar 11, 2026Published in: NEJM AI, Volume 3, No. 3 (March 2026). DOI: 10.1056/AIp2501326
Spillover Effects in Randomized Evaluations of Translational AI
ResearchPosted on rand.org Mar 11, 2026Published in: NEJM AI, Volume 3, No. 3 (March 2026). DOI: 10.1056/AIp2501326
The Perspective “Evaluating Translational AI: A Two-Way Moving Target Problem” aptly describes two fundamental challenges that occur when health systems evaluate predictive AI models that inform clinical decision-making. Leuchter et al. highlight how traditional evaluation approaches are rendered inadequate due to a two-way moving target problem caused by (1) concurrent-intervention confounding prior to implementation and (2) action-induced outcome bias that occurs after implementation. To address these challenges, they recommend short-term randomized controlled evaluations to assess model effectiveness prior to complete adoption. Although such randomized evaluations are warranted, they face a third challenge that could lead to misestimation of AI model effectiveness: spillover due to constraints on care delivery.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.