Improving Policy Evaluations Of The Opioid Crisis

Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Beth Ann Griffin, Megan S. Schuler, Rosanna Smart, Sean Grant, David Powell, Sarah Axeen, Seema Choksy Pessar, Corey S. Davis, Elizabeth A. Stuart, et al.

ResearchPosted on rand.org Sep 11, 2025Published in: Health Affairs, Volume 44, No. 9, pages 1042-1049 (September 2025). DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00418

With fatal opioid overdoses rising steadily between 1999 and 2022, researchers have tried to identify effective policy approaches that can stem the tide and mitigate associated harms. However, policy evaluations intended to inform policy choices may muddy the waters, particularly when they generate inconsistent findings.

In this article, we discuss a unifying framework and language for presenting analyses using quasi-experimental methods evaluating opioid policies to facilitate greater understanding of similarities and differences across studies. We discuss key data, methods, and design issues that confront researchers in this space, with the goal of increasing the pace of good science.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Health Affairs
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2025
  • Pages: 8
  • Document Number: EP-71086

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.