Making the "Birthing-Friendly" Hospital Designation Better

Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew

ResearchPosted on rand.org Sep 5, 2025Published in: Health Affairs Scholar, qxaf170 (2025). DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf170

The "Birthing-Friendly" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of Project HOPE - The People-To-People Health Foundation, Inc
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2025
  • Pages: 22
  • Document Number: EP-71064

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.