Barriers to Providing Procedural Abortion Care Among Trained Clinicians

An Evaluation of an Abortion Training Program

Julia Rollison, Skye A. Miner, Zachary Predmore

ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 5, 2025Published in: Contraception, Volume 147 (July 2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110901

Objectives

Understand the barriers and facilitators that clinicians face in delivering procedural abortion care following participation in an abortion training program and how these barriers may differ based on professional characteristics (e.g. specialty, career stage) and institutional factors (e.g., clinic policies).

Study design

This analysis is part of a larger evaluation of a clinical training program focused on equipping clinicians with procedural abortion skills. Data collection occurred 07/2020-01/2024 and included semi-structured interviews and post-program surveys collected annually following program completion. Program participants who completed at least two surveys are included.

Results

Forty-four ob-gyn and family medicine physicians met the inclusion criteria for this study. About one-third of program participants provided procedural abortion care 6 months following training and at their last survey (18-, 30- or 42 months post-training), and one-third did not provide at either time point. Barriers and facilitators for those providing abortion care often changed as program participants became more established in their practices (particularly post-residency). While local and state policies influenced the ability to provide care, other institutional and professional factors, including career stage, were often reported with some differences by specialty and career stage.

Conclusions

Structural and institutional barriers proved significant to those seeking to provide care post-training. Institutions looking to support abortion care should also ensure that this support is given to family medicine physicians. As program participants often had challenges finding work, training programs should focus on helping program participants build networks of providers to provide comprehensive training and job placement support.

Implications

Institutional, career and personal factors have compounding effects on individuals' ability to utilize their abortion training. While abortion training programs are helpful in training providers, program participants from these programs need additional networking and institutional supports to be able to provide procedural abortion care.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Elsevier Inc
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2025
  • Pages: 6
  • Document Number: EP-70942

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.