The Development of a Patient-Reported Functional Limitations Index

Megan Mathews, Denis Agniel, Marc N. Elliott, Steven C. Martino, Paul Guerino, Nathan Orr, Judy H. Ng, Megan K. Beckett

ResearchPosted on rand.org Feb 5, 2025Published in: The American Journal of Managed Care, Volume 26, Issue 7, pages e225-e231 (July 2020). DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43765

Objectives

To develop an easy-to-interpret, patient-reported Functional Limitations Index (FLI) that can be used to assess and monitor the full spectrum of functioning in a community-dwelling population.

Study Design

Observational design using nationally representative survey data.

Methods

We used self-rated health as a criterion for empirically assigning weights to 5 National Health Interview Survey items assessing difficulty with seeing, hearing, walking, cognition, and self-care. In addition to succinctly summarizing cumulative limitations, we addressed 2 main questions: (1) Which limitations have stronger associations with self-rated health? and (2) How does severity (from 0, no difficulty, to 3, unable to do) relate to self-rated health? We generated a respondent-level summary score based on a model predicting self-rated health from the 5 linearly scored (0-3) items and used splines to account for nonlinear severity—self-rated health associations.

Results

The strongest association of specific functional limitations with self-rated health involved mobility; the weakest associations involved sensory limitations. The association of severity with self-rated health was nonlinear and largest moving from no difficulty to somewhat difficult. Nationally, 5% of noninstitutionalized adults were considered most limited, 8% somewhat limited, and 87% least limited. Great mobility limitations (defined as a lot of difficulty or unable to do) most distinguished limitation groups (present in 0% of least limited, 25% of somewhat limited, and 70% of most limited).

Conclusions

The FLI is an easy-to-administer, easy-to-interpret, and valid summary measure of disability that health plans and health care organizations can use for quality-of-care monitoring across a variety of settings to improve care for patients with disabilities.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2020
  • Pages: 16
  • Document Number: EP-70835

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.