Desistance Mandates Compared with Treatment Mandates in Criminal Justice Populations

Mark A. R. Kleiman, Beau Kilmer, Angela Hawken

ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 8, 2017Published in: Addiction, Volume 112, Issue 5 (May 2017), Pages 748-750. doi: 10.1111/add.13635

Policymakers and practitioners seeking to reduce substance use among criminally-involved individuals have alternatives to mandated treatment. The extent to which desistance mandates (or other alternatives) might be substituted for treatment mandates remains to be determined both by careful experiment and by closely-observed practice.

Read More

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: Society for the Study of Addiction
  • Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2017
  • Pages: 3
  • Document Number: EP-67186

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.